Geographical provenance proved more difficult to establish. The samples examined from Sri Lanka and southern India showed substantial material similarities, which may be associated with related processing traditions. The Thai samples displayed a comparatively distinct material profile in the dataset, which may be related to the unique processing traditions in some areas of Thailand. Systematic material differences identified between the groups suggest material fingerprints related to regional processing practices, but reliable geographical attribution is not yet possible, as some provenance groups were represented by relatively few samples and the influence of ageing and preservation conditions on the material properties could only be partially assessed.
Patrick Huber, co-author and head of a project on ‘Multiscale Materials Characterisation as a Function of Processing Methods for Novel and Ancient Palm-Leaf Manuscripts’ at the CSMC, explains this limitation: ‘The material data alone cannot yet establish geographical provenance with certainty. The properties of the leaves are shaped by several interacting factors, and the available sample groups are not equally large. The findings therefore need to be interpreted alongside historical and codicological evidence.’
Material analysis offers manuscript researchers an additional way to investigate historical objects. Co-author Giovanni Ciotti, an Indologist who leads the ‘Palm-Leaf Manuscript Profiling Initiative’ (PLMPI), explains: ‘For manuscript studies, the most exciting point is that material analysis can reveal relationships that are not visible from script, form, or catalogue information alone. These physical signatures become culturally meaningful when they are interpreted together with codicological and historical evidence – for example when we ask whether different objects may share manufacturing traditions or routes of knowledge transmission.’
Huber highlights the importance of bringing scientific methods together with questions from the humanities: ‘Synchrotron radiation is not an end in itself here. Its real value emerges when the exceptional sensitivity of these methods is brought together with precise questions from the humanities. This work shows how a large-scale research infrastructure can create entirely new sources of evidence for cultural and manuscript studies – non-destructively, quantitatively, and across collections.’
The publication is the latest outcome of the collaboration on ‘Artefact Profiling’ between DESY and the CSMC. In addition to their joint work on palm-leaf manuscripts, researchers from both institutions have examined sealed cuneiform tablets using a mobile CT scanner and analysed the physical properties of historical Tibetan religious documents, among other projects.






