In consultation with their colleagues from Graz, Sebastian and Grzegorz had drawn up a comprehensive plan to examine the object in a short space of time using a range of different methods. ‘First and foremost, we are looking for new scientific evidence to confirm or refute the codex hypothesis,’ says Sebastian. ‘This is very difficult, but one key to this could be the analyses of the holes in the papyrus.’ In order to better understand how and if they were prickled, they are being analysed microscopically in the laboratory. If the analyses confirm the assumption that they are human-made, this would be an important step.
But the investigations are about more than that, as Grzegorz explains: ‘There is a whole series of other questions that we are looking at on this occasion. For example, we want to know which inks were used and whether there are any remains of writing or drawings on the papyrus that are no longer visible. Finding residues of writing on the verso side of the papyrus would also make a strong argument for the codex thesis.’ To find out, X-ray fluorescence and multispectral analyses have also been carried out. Another question is how exactly the papyrus was later reworked into part of the cartonnage that was found with the mummy that now gives the object its name.
The measurements alone have taken over a week, but that is just the beginning. The data will now be analysed. It is not yet clear whether this will lead to a reassessment of the question of whether the Graz Mummy Book really is a book. In any case, the object, which ended up as recycled material in ancient Egypt and was then stored largely unnoticed in Graz University Library for over a hundred years, already deserves a special place in codicology. It shows how quickly supposed certainties can be shaken in research – and how difficult it is to reconcile our observations with the categories we are familiar with.